<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTML5 Performance Tested Against Flash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2010/03/html5-performance-tested-against-flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2010/03/html5-performance-tested-against-flash/</link>
	<description>Ryan Stewart on the Flash Platform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:03:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryanstewart</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2010/03/html5-performance-tested-against-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-190574</link>
		<dc:creator>ryanstewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/?p=2381#comment-190574</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about that, this performance increase is across the board. And we obviously had to make Linux better to work on Android devices.

=Ryan
ryan@adobe.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about that, this performance increase is across the board. And we obviously had to make Linux better to work on Android devices.</p>
<p>=Ryan<br />
<a href="mailto:ryan@adobe.com">ryan@adobe.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2010/03/html5-performance-tested-against-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-188818</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/?p=2381#comment-188818</guid>
		<description>@JulesLt, without seeing the code for Quicktime in OSX, is it possible to make the distinction? Quicktime has access to hardware H.64 decoding - and OSX desktop apps like Chrome consequently have access to it through the Quicktime API - so is Quicktime&#039;s access based all on custom, low-level code or is there a private API in OSX that it&#039;s accessing? I guess it also depends on your defintion of API but I would imagine that there&#039;s some sort of interface that Quicktime is using that might easily become a &#039;public&#039; API.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JulesLt, without seeing the code for Quicktime in OSX, is it possible to make the distinction? Quicktime has access to hardware H.64 decoding &#8211; and OSX desktop apps like Chrome consequently have access to it through the Quicktime API &#8211; so is Quicktime&#8217;s access based all on custom, low-level code or is there a private API in OSX that it&#8217;s accessing? I guess it also depends on your defintion of API but I would imagine that there&#8217;s some sort of interface that Quicktime is using that might easily become a &#8216;public&#8217; API.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JulesLt</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2010/03/html5-performance-tested-against-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-188742</link>
		<dc:creator>JulesLt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/?p=2381#comment-188742</guid>
		<description>To be fair, it&#039;s not a case of access to APIs, so much as existence of equivalent APIs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, it&#8217;s not a case of access to APIs, so much as existence of equivalent APIs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
