<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Pretense of the Open Web Gone?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2009/03/is-the-pretense-of-the-open-web-gone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2009/03/is-the-pretense-of-the-open-web-gone/</link>
	<description>Just an average guy trying to drink above average beer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert O'Callahan</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2009/03/is-the-pretense-of-the-open-web-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-72598</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert O'Callahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/?p=1751#comment-72598</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve been incubating our canvas3d experiment at Mozilla for a while now, but we haven&#039;t shipped anything in a product. The announcement you link to is about getting Khronos involved. Khronos is a standards organization, they manage OpenGL.

So we announce we&#039;re working with a recognized standards organization to standardize Canvas 3D, before we ship anything, and you take that as a cue to comment about how browser vendors aren&#039;t working with standards? Weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been incubating our canvas3d experiment at Mozilla for a while now, but we haven&#8217;t shipped anything in a product. The announcement you link to is about getting Khronos involved. Khronos is a standards organization, they manage OpenGL.</p>
<p>So we announce we&#8217;re working with a recognized standards organization to standardize Canvas 3D, before we ship anything, and you take that as a cue to comment about how browser vendors aren&#8217;t working with standards? Weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2009/03/is-the-pretense-of-the-open-web-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-72236</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/?p=1751#comment-72236</guid>
		<description>Browsers have pushed their own innovations for a long time. Standards always lag, and are often more of a matter of politics than anything else. Let&#039;s not forget that Microsoft invented XMLHttpRequest. It was no standard. Others copied it and only then did it become a standard. Canvas was invented by Safari, only later on it became a standard and was adopted by Mozilla. It is a worthless standard though, because of the 75% of browsers (flavors of IE) that do not implement it.

@JulesLt -- RSL for JavaScript? Most major sites put their common JS in a shared file, put an expiry date far in the future, and push that to a CDN. That gives you everything an RSL gives you. If you want to cache across sites, you could use Google&#039;s Ajax Libraries: http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/ . That&#039;s even better than RSLs, since you cache across sites, something you can only currently do with the Flex framework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Browsers have pushed their own innovations for a long time. Standards always lag, and are often more of a matter of politics than anything else. Let&#8217;s not forget that Microsoft invented XMLHttpRequest. It was no standard. Others copied it and only then did it become a standard. Canvas was invented by Safari, only later on it became a standard and was adopted by Mozilla. It is a worthless standard though, because of the 75% of browsers (flavors of IE) that do not implement it.</p>
<p>@JulesLt &#8212; RSL for JavaScript? Most major sites put their common JS in a shared file, put an expiry date far in the future, and push that to a CDN. That gives you everything an RSL gives you. If you want to cache across sites, you could use Google&#8217;s Ajax Libraries: <a href="http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/</a> . That&#8217;s even better than RSLs, since you cache across sites, something you can only currently do with the Flex framework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryanstewart</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2009/03/is-the-pretense-of-the-open-web-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-72215</link>
		<dc:creator>ryanstewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/?p=1751#comment-72215</guid>
		<description>@Bjorn, nope, it&#039;s not meant as a dig against Mozilla. Google has been arguably the worst offender but I feel like Mozilla has been taking the high road in most situations. As I said, I don&#039;t blame them, but the fact that they&#039;re starting to move in the same direction as everyone else was notable.

@JulesLt, I like the RSL idea for JavaScript frameworks. Definitely an area where Adobe could provide soe good input and ideas I think.

=Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bjorn, nope, it&#8217;s not meant as a dig against Mozilla. Google has been arguably the worst offender but I feel like Mozilla has been taking the high road in most situations. As I said, I don&#8217;t blame them, but the fact that they&#8217;re starting to move in the same direction as everyone else was notable.</p>
<p>@JulesLt, I like the RSL idea for JavaScript frameworks. Definitely an area where Adobe could provide soe good input and ideas I think.</p>
<p>=Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JulesLt</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2009/03/is-the-pretense-of-the-open-web-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-72169</link>
		<dc:creator>JulesLt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/?p=1751#comment-72169</guid>
		<description>Harry - that&#039;s very much it. If you read Tim Berners-Lee&#039;s &#039;Weaving the Web&#039; you realise that HTML and XML 1.0 were innovation phase - you can see that by all the sensible and more complex changes since.

C, Unix, Linux (LSB) are also all examples of technologies where the &#039;standardisation&#039; phase came later - and indeed the same is true of many other programming languages.

I&#039;m still not 100% convinced of the idea of downloading vast chunks of JavaScript when I visit web-sites - browser vendors need to sort out something like Flash RSL for JavaScript frameworks, or we will have the worst of both worlds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry &#8211; that&#8217;s very much it. If you read Tim Berners-Lee&#8217;s &#8216;Weaving the Web&#8217; you realise that HTML and XML 1.0 were innovation phase &#8211; you can see that by all the sensible and more complex changes since.</p>
<p>C, Unix, Linux (LSB) are also all examples of technologies where the &#8216;standardisation&#8217; phase came later &#8211; and indeed the same is true of many other programming languages.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still not 100% convinced of the idea of downloading vast chunks of JavaScript when I visit web-sites &#8211; browser vendors need to sort out something like Flash RSL for JavaScript frameworks, or we will have the worst of both worlds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjorn Schultheiss</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2009/03/is-the-pretense-of-the-open-web-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-72167</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjorn Schultheiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/?p=1751#comment-72167</guid>
		<description>If this article is a dig at mozilla trying to bring them down to the level of Adobe, then that&#039;s a pretty lame argument.

The fact that flash is closed means as a developer i have to consider whether to use flash or js based on there capabilities.

If it was all open i feel we would be 5 years ahead in available capabilities than what we currently are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this article is a dig at mozilla trying to bring them down to the level of Adobe, then that&#8217;s a pretty lame argument.</p>
<p>The fact that flash is closed means as a developer i have to consider whether to use flash or js based on there capabilities.</p>
<p>If it was all open i feel we would be 5 years ahead in available capabilities than what we currently are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2009/03/is-the-pretense-of-the-open-web-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-72155</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/?p=1751#comment-72155</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it&#039;s that innovation happens in one phase, and then open standards happen in the next.

W3C isn&#039;t just now getting behind the times.  They have always been behind the times.  It&#039;s their job to ensure that they are standardizing something solid rather than something trendy that won&#039;t have staying power.

So for right now, I&#039;m just gonna sit back, add a few more tweens to a few more rotationY properties, and give them something new to standardize!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s that innovation happens in one phase, and then open standards happen in the next.</p>
<p>W3C isn&#8217;t just now getting behind the times.  They have always been behind the times.  It&#8217;s their job to ensure that they are standardizing something solid rather than something trendy that won&#8217;t have staying power.</p>
<p>So for right now, I&#8217;m just gonna sit back, add a few more tweens to a few more rotationY properties, and give them something new to standardize!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polyGeek</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2009/03/is-the-pretense-of-the-open-web-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-72154</link>
		<dc:creator>polyGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/?p=1751#comment-72154</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s amazing the work that goes into HTML/CSS standards. I don&#039;t get it. The only HTML tags anyone would ever need is Object/Embed. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing the work that goes into HTML/CSS standards. I don&#8217;t get it. The only HTML tags anyone would ever need is Object/Embed. <img src='http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 299/300 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blog.digitalbackcountry.com @ 2012-02-09 02:56:42 -->
