<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Desktop as a Revenue Growth Opportunity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2008/07/the-desktop-as-a-revenue-growth-opportunity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2008/07/the-desktop-as-a-revenue-growth-opportunity/</link>
	<description>Just an average guy trying to drink above average beer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2008/07/the-desktop-as-a-revenue-growth-opportunity/comment-page-1/#comment-5999</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/?p=1521#comment-5999</guid>
		<description>I think AOL internal culture is now follow instead of lead. Look at the first part of the note.

- Toolbar: Accelerate the distribution and monetization of toolbars to drive revenue derived from search and recirculation.

They&#039;re looking at G&#039;s search revenue and are wondering why they missed the boat.

 I totally agree with the fact that most users are &quot;afraid&quot; to start using web apps (security also a big issue).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think AOL internal culture is now follow instead of lead. Look at the first part of the note.</p>
<p>- Toolbar: Accelerate the distribution and monetization of toolbars to drive revenue derived from search and recirculation.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re looking at G&#8217;s search revenue and are wondering why they missed the boat.</p>
<p> I totally agree with the fact that most users are &#8220;afraid&#8221; to start using web apps (security also a big issue).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Kerman</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2008/07/the-desktop-as-a-revenue-growth-opportunity/comment-page-1/#comment-6001</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Kerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/?p=1521#comment-6001</guid>
		<description>AIR is cool and all, but if you wanted a really turbo desktop app you&#039;d never do it with AIR.  I shouldn&#039;t say &quot;never&quot; but I mean, the advantages of using AIR (that I can see) are:
--recycle knowledge you have in Flash player.
--take advantage of some ready-built stuff like sql-lite and drag&amp;drop
--leverage the sweet distribution AIR can provide.

So, those are big... but, again, if you want to make a really killer desktop app those things aren&#039;t enough.  You need to see AIR as the best solution technically.  It may or may not be.  So, to say desktop stuff is big for AOL therefore AIR should be big is a leap.  You&#039;re begging the question whether AIR solves that need.

Not saying it sucks in all cases, but I&#039;ve yet to see an AIR app that looks and feels like a &quot;real&quot; desktop app.  I&#039;ve seen more Director apps that do (not trying to say Director is the end all either!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AIR is cool and all, but if you wanted a really turbo desktop app you&#8217;d never do it with AIR.  I shouldn&#8217;t say &#8220;never&#8221; but I mean, the advantages of using AIR (that I can see) are:<br />
&#8211;recycle knowledge you have in Flash player.<br />
&#8211;take advantage of some ready-built stuff like sql-lite and drag&amp;drop<br />
&#8211;leverage the sweet distribution AIR can provide.</p>
<p>So, those are big&#8230; but, again, if you want to make a really killer desktop app those things aren&#8217;t enough.  You need to see AIR as the best solution technically.  It may or may not be.  So, to say desktop stuff is big for AOL therefore AIR should be big is a leap.  You&#8217;re begging the question whether AIR solves that need.</p>
<p>Not saying it sucks in all cases, but I&#8217;ve yet to see an AIR app that looks and feels like a &#8220;real&#8221; desktop app.  I&#8217;ve seen more Director apps that do (not trying to say Director is the end all either!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathew</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2008/07/the-desktop-as-a-revenue-growth-opportunity/comment-page-1/#comment-6000</link>
		<dc:creator>mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/?p=1521#comment-6000</guid>
		<description>combine desktop persistence with serving useful ads? brilliant!

who did that before? gator?

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>combine desktop persistence with serving useful ads? brilliant!</p>
<p>who did that before? gator?<br />
 <img src='http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 239/241 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blog.digitalbackcountry.com @ 2012-02-09 04:21:54 -->
