<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can You Build an RIA Platform Without Designers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2007/05/can-you-build-an-ria-platform-without-designers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2007/05/can-you-build-an-ria-platform-without-designers/</link>
	<description>Just an average guy trying to drink above average beer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Potter</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2007/05/can-you-build-an-ria-platform-without-designers/comment-page-1/#comment-2722</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 04:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/?p=798#comment-2722</guid>
		<description>I was suprised that they seemed to miss this.  Even their demo (Space Invadors) is lame.  import 4 gifs, that should be good enough to create a rich Internet application.

BTW: Sun is referring to it as Rich User to User Applications.  Should I register ruuapedia.com?

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was suprised that they seemed to miss this.  Even their demo (Space Invadors) is lame.  import 4 gifs, that should be good enough to create a rich Internet application.</p>
<p>BTW: Sun is referring to it as Rich User to User Applications.  Should I register ruuapedia.com?</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weyert</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/2007/05/can-you-build-an-ria-platform-without-designers/comment-page-1/#comment-2721</link>
		<dc:creator>Weyert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 02:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com/?p=798#comment-2721</guid>
		<description>Yep, JavaFX looks too much oriented to the developer then the designer. The language ain&#039;t that hard (at first sight) but still the designer in me prefers authoring tools like Expression Studio or Flash to make stuff.

Nicely, integrated with tools like PhotoShop or Illustrator would be even nicer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, JavaFX looks too much oriented to the developer then the designer. The language ain&#8217;t that hard (at first sight) but still the designer in me prefers authoring tools like Expression Studio or Flash to make stuff.</p>
<p>Nicely, integrated with tools like PhotoShop or Illustrator would be even nicer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.020 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 220/221 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blog.digitalbackcountry.com @ 2012-02-09 05:14:19 -->
