I had a post over on ZDNet that I wasn’t that happy with. I’ve had writer’s bloc the past week and it carried over from the weekend. Partly it’s just because I’ve been heads down on my project so haven’t had time for news – my primary source of inspiration.
After I posted today Matt asked me an interesting question, “can they still be called RIAs if they’re desktop apps?” And it’s a valid question. I think the answer is it depends. As Matt noted while we were chatting (he has some great thoughts up on his blog from our conversation) there are a lot of desktop applications that aren’t rich. Something I think the web has been very good at is bringing more of a design-eye to small scale development. There are a lot of good web apps that are more usable than desktop applications.
I think in the end there is a kind of application, one that uses web technologies and incorporates multimedia, design and user interface work, that is that much better than what we have now. It spans to mobile devices, to browser applications and the desktop. Is the ideal term for this kind of application a Rich Internet Application? Maybe not, but the term has come to be an umbrella for a better software experience no matter what the delivery mechanism. I think that’s an indication of how much growth and interest there is in focusing on experience and building richer apps.
[tags]Rich Internet Applications[/tags]
TweetRelated posts:
Pingback: Yes or No, is Ajax a RIA Technology? « You can solve your problem here..